tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19208183.post8000217171919044136..comments2023-10-22T14:14:16.419+01:00Comments on J. Arthur MacNumpty: Two Thoughts OccurWillhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10978812670312106107noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19208183.post-13962380579256711482010-01-24T14:56:31.068+00:002010-01-24T14:56:31.068+00:00typical labour more interested in the sponging roy...typical labour more interested in the sponging royals that the people who realy need helpAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19208183.post-19253113564361797112010-01-22T22:00:49.553+00:002010-01-22T22:00:49.553+00:00I'm sure that the Freedom to Roam law would be...I'm sure that the Freedom to Roam law would be overridden by any threat to the head of state, or any other terrorist threat, as it probably should.<br /><br />But Iain Gray has certainly pointed out that the feet of any terrorists who want to blow up the Queen and her immediate family will not get wet in the grass around Balmoral.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19208183.post-21631833281664399652010-01-21T20:39:30.731+00:002010-01-21T20:39:30.731+00:00I think it's something to do with the freedom ...I think it's something to do with the freedom to roam or some such legislation Will. There's certainly some law which says something like the land belongs to the people and the land owners are secondary. Don't have time at the moment to check it all out.<br /><br />Agree with your second post, which makes Iain Gray's point more absurd.subrosahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00151702590329788260noreply@blogger.com